Choosing the Right Surgical Approach for Hemorrhoi...

recurrence compared treatment option criteria doctors conclusion choosing training ensure patients health whiteheads methods 2 pain bleeding milliganmorgan technique bleeding infection recurrence procedures patient prefers hemorrhoids choosing severity hemorrhoids grade ii grade iii patients choose healthcare providers surgeon skill rbl irc permanent solution patients seeking low tolerance milliganmorgan ferguson multiple sessions allergic reaction band slippage quick procedure larger portion skilled surgeon pain management postoperative pain comfortable postoperative infection excellent healthcare provider limitations understanding anus depending inflamed veins open hemorrhoidectomy infection risk surgical team minimal downtime minimal pain surgical approach pain procedures repeat procedures choice depends prolapsed hemorrhoids ii hemorrhoids selection hemorrhoids favorable options prolapsed tissue conservative treatments quicker recovery hemorrhoidal arteries stapled hemorrhoidopexy hemorrhoidectomy depends iv hemorrhoids short recovery traditional hemorrhoidectomy stapled hemorrhoidopexy dghal incisions required effective minimal pain procedures hemorrhoidectomy pros cons grade iv hemorrhoids long recovery risk incision needed suitable hemorrhoids patient preferences quick recovery cons short recovery cons iv hemorrhoids risk traditional hemorrhoidectomy suitable hemorrhoid surgery depends traditional hemorrhoidectomy techniques smaller hemorrhoids risk surgical techniques exist conventional hemorrhoidectomy procedures iv hemorrhoids potential patients condition individually anatomical considerations pros hemorrhoidal tissue leading stapling device risk discomfort increased risk minimally invasive procedures manually reduced options minimally invasive treatments severe hemorrhoidal prolapse longer recovery time slightly higher chance precise artery ligation closed wound reducing